Delete, delete, delete (by Conrad) One of the leitmotif of the last election campaign was as follows: the center-right opposition accused the then want to delete all the reforms of the parliamentary term was nearing completion, while the reformist wing of the Union claimed to have only intention to make targeted improvements, without distorting or revolutionize everything, because you can not submit every five years the country continues to shock legislation. Only the extremist parties (those that will not be part of the future Democratic Party because they are inspired by communism to democracy and then not) had a will Repealing absolute; personally, I well remember some propaganda posters of the PDCI in this sense.
After five months of term, and three months of heavy government, we have a picture quite different from that outlined by the reformists of the center.
The reform introduces
Castles - or should I say, introducing - the separation of function as in all great democratic countries of the world (excluding France), the introduction of criteria for accelerated career advancement based on merit, the Birth of the School of the Judiciary in order to provide a more solid educational profile for those who must deal with an increasingly complex legislative framework, with the proliferation of sources, strengthening the role and responsibilities of the chief prosecutor. They are all measures that are not vindictive against the judiciary, except that it does not rinchuida in a defense of corporate interests, and is meant as an attack on the judiciary's what launched these minority interests and partisan - as if in reality legislative prerogative not of the parliament, and if the constant demands, pressures and strikes by an order exercising the judicial power does not constitute a violation of the separation of state powers.
One of the first acts of the Prodi government was the postponement of the implementation of this law in March 2007, and the proposal for dialogue magistrates. The deferral of the bill has not yet been approved by parliament, then additional changes were announced by Justice Minister Clemente Mastella will - according to the same Udeur leader - to be agreed with the judges. The ANM but it did
know that to be changed to be "crucial points" of reform. As if to say: basically, cancelliamola.
The Moratti reform of the school, the EU Commission led by Romano Prodi had literally held high, is undergoing a much more rapid dismantling. Already postponed for two years by the mayor of Milan, the reform of the second cycle, the new Minister Fioroni immediately stopped any future application, and proceeded to
cancellation of the main points of the first round of reform: abolish the right and duty to education to 18 years, and restored the requirement to 16 (taking us back behind the most advanced countries), abolished the tutor and full restoration of team teaching and assessment (as the unions wanted, not thinking about the relationship with the families but egalitarian thinking in a logical time to the privilege of the person providing the service and not those who use), abolished the portfolio of skills, and therefore the possibility of having a complete picture of the formation of the student as a child until of age (for charity, once with a piece of paper in hand, all are equal), abolished the entrances to the school in advance, which had been popular with families in the two previous school years. In other words, the happy union of the school, known to be among the toughest and most conservative wing of the extremist majority. Reform of the school gate.
Even on foreign policy, the boast is that of a reversal of Berlusconi's foreign policy, and Frattini Fini. Whilst it may be that way (on the signs of continuity with the previous government, in Parliament that the decisions were taken in agreement between the Union and the House of Freedom, it would be make a long speech here and now neglected), the triumphalism of Prodi, dalemiana the usual arrogance, provincialism of the Unit
hanging from the lips of what once was (and no longer is) the most authoritative newspaper of world, the New York Times, are a symptom of a desire to erase the past of the last five years. The enthusiastic endorsement of Mr Prodi's foreign policy by Diliberto, known eulogist line Andreotti, are a symptom of this detector. Erasers
In the crosshairs of the Union there are also the Frattini law on conflict of interest (which, like the American model legislation
so loved by our Government gives priority to ex post controls and sanctions of an economic and not political), the second module of the tax reform (except to continue to lick their fingers in front of the boom in revenue for the last years of the Berlusconi government, and that financial Tremonti judged to character of elections), the pension reform (in a footnote
the Ministry of Labour was given to us to know that you will return to the Dini reform in 1995) and mechanisms included in the infamous goal-law, designed to facilitate the speed of implementation act of public works.
Reformism "autonomous" - let's call it - the EU, has so far revealed only in the wishful thinking liberalized Bersani (currency exchange for other placet government in case of banks, useless and inconsistent in the case of taxis, and effective in only a few, and limited other areas - with particular care not to touch your friends, or perceived as such) Visco in aggression and tax (with its mess in the real estate industry, three billion euro burned in the market). For the rest nothing.
Proving that he was right House of Freedom, in the election campaign, to raise the alarm and antiriformatore conservative, and those who did not believe it was wrong, including voters.
They know only with taxes and govern in the name of adversity sbianchetto staff and ruling against an individual, other than to change the country, the seriousness and restart the government of Italy.
written by Corrado